· 1/25/2008
Chao v. Branch 4798 National Ass'n of Letter Carriers
Citations
- 532 F. Supp. 2d 783
- 183 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2714
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7213
- 2008 WL 281838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the purposes of the LMRDA would bq served by having the Secretary supervise the next regularly-scheduled election, where the union had already conducted a re-run election, and upcoming election would take place ten months from the Court’s decision
- finding notice violation where “[t]his question is easily answered in the affirmative given this record and [the Union’s] concession that § 401 violations occurred in the December election”
- describing scenario where “election violations were challenged by an incumbent union faction which intentionally violated the LMRDA election rules, lost the election, and then complained to the Secretary in an effort to undo the election results.”
- “once a district court finds election violations occurred, the court shall declare the election to be void and direct the conduct of a new election under the supervision of the Secretary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: T.S. Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.