Chao Qun Jiang v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to the Board to consider whether forced insertion of an IUD constitutes “persecution” under the Act
• remanding for clarification on IUD insertion as persecution where we affirmed an Immigration Judge’s decision finding that coerced insertion of an IUD constituted persecution of others, which barred a grant of asylum to the alien

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).