Skip to main content
· 4/4/1985

Chang v. University of Rhode Island

Citations

  • 606 F. Supp. 1161
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21062
  • 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 3
  • 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that employer’s “post-event rationalizations” were insufficient to justify initial higher salary for male employee
  • concluding that employer’s “post-event rationalizations” were insufficient to justify initial higher salary for male employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.