Skip to main content
· 3/30/2009

Chang v. District of Columbia Department of Regulatory & Consumer Affairs

Citations

  • 604 F. Supp. 2d 57
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While Mr. Masoero may have been incorrect in his interpretation of the Construction Codes, plaintiff has not alleged any motivation on the part of defendants that would make such an allegation amount to stating a claim for a substantive due process violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.