Chaney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient in that there was no showing that he was found in possession of the property alleged to have been stolen. Such is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Russo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-07· cited 95×
• Cordova v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-08-31· cited 10×
• Beau John Maloney v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-06-22
• Patrick Anthony Russo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-07
• Daviun Julien v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2000-06-28
• in Re: Joe Lee Touchstone, Relator
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-11-25
• in Re: Peggy Sue Melander, Relator
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-05-07
• Ricky D. Starks v. the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-09-24
• Jesus Antu v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-12-07
• Darold O. Simmons v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-11-16
• Carlos Jose Cordova v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-08-31
• Ryan Harrison v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-03-29