Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where deficiency existed between creditor and debtor on automobile installment contract, action more closely related to sales than to security
• indicating that fraudulent concealment is recognized in Oregon as basis for tolling the statute of limitations
• holding that an action for a deficiency is more closely related to the sales portion of the contract, but that an action by the defaulter to recover a surplus from the resale after foreclosure is more closely related to the security aspects of the contract
• holding that an action for a deficiency is more closely related to the sales portion of the contract, but that an action by the defaulter to recover a surplus from the resale after foreclosure is more closely related to the security aspects of the contract
• noting that a defendant’s wrongful concealment of facts that prevents discovery of a wrong or knowledge of a cause of action will toll the statute of limitations
• adopting and quoting L. S. Tellier, Comment Note, What Constitutes Concealment Which Will Prevent Running of Statute of Limitations, 173 ALR 576, 578 (1948)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).