Chandra Anand v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts generally do not consider extrinsic evidence when evaluating the sufficiency of a complaint unless such evidence is integral to the complaint
• explaining that courts do not consider extrinsic evidence in evaluating a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss
• explaining that federal court sitting in diversity applies state substantive law and federal procedural law
• affirming district court’s dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs’ quiet title claim because plaintiffs could not plausibly allege they had legal title to a property secured by a deed of trust
• considering, upon a motion to dismiss, a Deed of Trust in a case in which plaintiffs alleged that defendants had defaulted on a promissory note secured by the Deed of Trust
• court may consider integral attachments without converting the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).