Texas Supreme Court· 10/10/1956
Chandler v. Welborn
Citations
- 294 S.W.2d 801
- 156 Tex. 312
- 1956 Tex. LEXIS 607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When administration is pending, the heirs are generally not entitled to maintain a suit for the recovery of property belonging to the estate.... ”
- “It is well settled that a conveyance of exempt property may not be attacked on the ground that it was made in fraud of creditors.”
- “When administration is pending, the heirs are generally not entitled to maintain a suit for the recovery of property belonging to the estate . . . .”
- suit for trespass to try title to recover property conveyed to third party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court· 1972-10-04· cited 826×
- King v. JacksonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1987-01-22· cited 85×
- Duran v. HendersonTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-03-19· cited 46×
- Stout v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-09· cited 41×
- Muhm v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-03-29· cited 34×
- Wilbur Green, Administrator of the Estate of Phillip Ray Walker, Deceased v. William P. Hale, O. H. Thompson, Vaneta ThompsonFifth Circuit· 1970-11-17· cited 29×
- Ex Parte BowersTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-11-17· cited 29×
- In re the Guardianship of ArcherCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-05-03· cited 28×
- Mayhew v. DealeyTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-09-23· cited 27×
- Coakley v. ReisingTexas Supreme Court· 1968-12-31· cited 27×
- Smith v. Moody (In Re Moody)S.D. Texas· 1987-08-11· cited 26×
- In Re Estate of YorkTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-06-26· cited 26×
- Pratho v. ZapataCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-02-03· cited 25×
- Discovery Operating, Inc. v. BP America Production Co.Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-04-15· cited 25×
- Fillion v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-12· cited 23×
- Osherow v. Porras (In Re Porras)W.D. Texas· 2004-05-26· cited 21×
- Parvin v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-11-18· cited 21×
- Fulmer v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-17· cited 21×
- Lewis v. FosterTexas Supreme Court· 1981-09-16· cited 20×
- Sayner v. SholerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 16×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court· 1952-06-18· cited 180×
- Newton v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court· 1890-05-30· cited 116×
- Logan v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court· 1947-06-11· cited 78×
- Rogers v. RewardTexas Supreme Court· 1880-11-10· cited 59×
- Lee v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court· 1888-06-22· cited 37×
- J. R. Phillips Inv. Co. v. Road Dist. No. 18 of Limestone CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1943-04-29· cited 25×
- Lehmann v. KrahlTexas Supreme Court· 1955-11-30· cited 24×
- Hupp v. HuppCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1950-12-22· cited 20×
- Miller v. DyessTexas Supreme Court· 1941-03-19· cited 19×
- Crow v. First Nat. Bank of WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1933-09-28· cited 19×
- Crain v. CrainTexas Supreme Court· 1856-07-01· cited 16×
- Jackson v. Mumford'sTexas Supreme Court· 1889-05-21· cited 16×
- Gilbert v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia· 1847-11-15· cited 15×
- Thomason v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-09-16· cited 11×
- Mims v. HearonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-04-18· cited 10×
- Mead Co. v. DoerflerNebraska Supreme Court· 1945-04-27· cited 6×
- Chandler v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1955-09-23· cited 4×
Other cases named Chandler v. Welborn
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.