Chandler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the absence of any evidence that a video recording of an altercation that took place in a jail cell would have played a significant role in the defendant’s case, the video recording could be considered potentially useful at best
• finding no bad faith when a video of a prison riot was not preserved because prison policy required for the tape to be overridden in fourteen days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gary Donell Sanders v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2012-12-06· cited 20×
• Burdick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-06· cited 19×
• Keith Allen Hooper v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-10-09
• Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-02-19
• Jordan Michael Burdick v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-08-06
• Jerome Lydale Anderson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-12-22
• George Richard Hosey Sr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2018-04-12
• Ricardo Lopez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2019-08-07
• Luis Enrique Sanchez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2019-10-10
• State v. Michael Collaso
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2020-04-15