Chandler v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the court should “take a preliminary peek at the merits of the 9 allegedly dispositive motion to see if on its face there appears to be an 10 that it will be granted.” (citing Feldman v. Flood, 176 F.R.D. 651, 652 (M.D. Fla. 1997) 11 (emphasis in original))
• stating the court should “take a preliminary peek at the merits of the 9 allegedly dispositive motion to see if on its face there appears to be an 10 that it will be granted.” (quoting Feldman v. Flood, 176 F.R.D. 651, 652 (M.D. Fla. 11 1997) (emphasis in original))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).