Skip to main content
· 3/10/2003

Chandler v. Moscicki

Citations

  • 253 F. Supp. 2d 478
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4193
  • 2003 WL 1477008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “trial court correctly found that the theory of prosecution did not unconstitutionally change the basis for Chandler’s culpability as an accomplice rather than as a principal”
  • “As applicable to the states, the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause generally has been interpreted as requiring that a defendant is entitled to fair notice of the charges against him.” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foschio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.