· 11/25/1910
Chandler v. Inman
Citations
- 140 Ky. 786
- 131 S.W. 789
- 1910 Ky. LEXIS 358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Contra proferentem does not apply where contracts are negotiated by sophisticated parties of equal bargaining power.”
- “Contra proferentem does not apply where contracts are negotiated by sophisticated parties of equal bargaining power.”
- discussing avenues of analysis in cases of ambiguous contract language
- “If, however, the language in the insurance contract is ambiguous and susceptible of two reasonable interpretations, the parties may submit extrinsic evidence as an aid in construction, and the resolution of the ambiguity is for the trier of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carroll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.