Chandler v. Gober

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that test was not applicable where “victory has neither been attained nor assured”
• holding that test was not applicable where “victory has neither been attained nor assured”
• to be considered a prevailing party within the meaning of the EAJA, it must be shown that the litigant prevailed (1) by succeeding on the merits; (2) as a result of the suit’s “catalytic effects”; or (3) by application of the “inevitable victory” test
• to be considered a prevailing party within the meaning of the EAJA, it must be shown that the litigant prevailed (1) by succeeding on the merits; (2) as a result of the suit's \catalytic effects\; or (3) by application of the \inevitable victory\ test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heath v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1998-08-31· cited 26×
• Vaughn v. Principi
  Veterans Claims· 2001-11-09· cited 25×
• Briddell v. Principi
  Veterans Claims· 2002-08-23· cited 21×
• Luke C. Miley, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-12· cited 10×
• Weierbach v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1999-07-14· cited 8×
• Maddalino v. West
  Veterans Claims· 2000-05-09· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• William Langton v. Philip Johnston, John Bruder, John Bruder v. Philip Johnston, John Bruder v. Philip Johnston
  First Circuit· 1991-03-22· cited 123×
• Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Watt
  E.D. New York· 1982-10-22· cited 35×
• Lematta v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1996-01-26· cited 33×
• Correa v. Heckler
  S.D. New York· 1984-05-01· cited 21×
• Chandler v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1997-04-01· cited 9×
• Martinez v. Rhode Island Housing & Mortgage Finance Corp.
  D. Rhode Island· 1986-02-13· cited 7×
• Finn v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 1988-09-06· cited 7×