Skip to main content
· 4/5/1929

Chandler v. Burkhalter

Citations

  • 10 La. App. 575
  • 121 So. 353
  • 1929 La. App. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statute not unconstitutional on theory it denied equal protection, even though individual nonresident motorist defendants were subject to service of process via Director of Motor Vehicles
  • statute not unconstitutional on theory it denied equal protection, even though individual nonresident motorist defendants were subject to service of process via Director of Motor Vehicles
  • “The construction of a statute by the courts, supported ... by continued use of the same language or failure to amend the statute, is evidence that such construction is in accordance with legislative intent ....”
  • service in a motor vehicle case upon the Director of Motor Vehicles
  • “The construction of a statute by the courts, supported by long acquiescence on the part of the Legislature, or by continued use of the same language or failure to amend the statute, is evidence that such construction is in accordance with the legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.