Skip to main content
· 8/7/2008

Chandler-McPhail v. Duffey

Citations

  • 194 P.3d 434
  • 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1276
  • 2008 WL 3088430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the last antecedent rule applies only “in the absence of a contrary intention”
  • as a canon of statutory construction, referential and qualifying words and phrases refer to the clause immediately preceding them unless there is a contrary intention
  • absent a contrary intention, the last antecedent rule dictates that referential and qualifying words and phrases refer exclusively to the clause immediately preceding them
  • finding “structure” relevant to assessing third-party beneficiary status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loeb, Webb, Gabriel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.