Colorado Court of Appeals· 8/7/2008
Chandler-McPhail v. Duffey
Citations
- 194 P.3d 434
- 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1276
- 2008 WL 3088430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the last antecedent rule applies only “in the absence of a contrary intention”
- as a canon of statutory construction, referential and qualifying words and phrases refer to the clause immediately preceding them unless there is a contrary intention
- absent a contrary intention, the last antecedent rule dictates that referential and qualifying words and phrases refer exclusively to the clause immediately preceding them
- finding “structure” relevant to assessing third-party beneficiary status
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loeb, Webb, Gabriel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesTenth Circuit· 2020-02-19· cited 23×
- Stoesz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-06-18· cited 3×
- Paquet v. SmithD. Colorado· 2012-02-21· cited 3×
- Fuel Automation v. EnergeraTenth Circuit· 2024-10-21· cited 2×
- v. Governor's Office of Information TechnologyColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-05-21· cited 1×
- Summit Bank & Trust v. American Modern Home InsuranceD. Colorado· 2014-10-09· cited 1×
- Connecticut Ins. Guaranty Assn. v. DrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-10-21
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Everett v. Dickinson & Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-04-18· cited 336×
- Harwig v. DowneyColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-09-12· cited 328×
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 194×
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-08-03· cited 139×
- Allen v. PachecoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-06-09· cited 85×
- City & County of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-06-30· cited 79×
- Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-12-29· cited 75×
- Jefferson County School District No. R-1 v. ShoreySupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-03-10· cited 59×
- Stewman Ranch, Inc. v. Double M. Ranch, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-06-29· cited 51×
- Chase v. INDEPENDENT PRACTICE ASSOCIATION, INCMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-12-17· cited 47×
- Estate of David v. SnelsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-07-17· cited 44×
- ACS Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-29· cited 34×
- People v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1980-08-25· cited 28×
- Wohl v. SwinneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-05-20· cited 28×
- Bloom v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-05-06· cited 27×
- Albright v. McDermondSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-11-14· cited 26×
- Roberts v. AdamsColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-12-20· cited 26×
- Parker v. Center for Creative LeadershipColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-11-09· cited 25×
- Gullett v. Van Dyke Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court· 2005-04-26· cited 18×
- Winter Park Real Estate & Investments, Inc. v. AndersonColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.