Chance v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The law calls such a transaction a wrongful conversion, from which a fraudulent intent can be inferred, provided the jury believe that such fraudulent intent actually existed” held to be a proper instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hanna
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-11-16· cited 12×
• Curtis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1933-12-18· cited 12×
• Birdsong v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1937-05-05· cited 5×
• Drury v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1955-04-18

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coxwell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1881-02-15· cited 41×
• Mangham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1912-08-09· cited 34×
• Beck v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1886-04-20· cited 31×
• Montross v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1884-04-25· cited 17×
• Nero v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1906-11-07· cited 16×
• Hackney v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1897-05-05· cited 13×
• Richardson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1907-12-20· cited 12×
• Tiget v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1900-01-24· cited 11×
• Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1906-05-16· cited 11×
• Howard v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1884-04-26· cited 8×
• King v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1911-08-04· cited 8×
• Green v. Hines
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1920-04-14· cited 3×