Chance v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It has never been the rule in Kansas that a defendant in a criminal action must be apprised by the State prior to conviction that the State intends to invoke the habitual criminal act.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Erlinger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2024-06-21· cited 403×
• State v. Albano
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-05-28· cited 63×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-07-14· cited 45×
• State v. Fountaine
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-05-07· cited 15×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1967-03-04· cited 10×
• Kelly v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-03-05· cited 10×
• State v. Peterson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1967-03-04· cited 8×
• Mann v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1968-01-27· cited 7×
• Palmer v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1967-05-13· cited 6×
• Chance v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1967-01-21· cited 3×
• Wasson v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1972-07-19· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Daegele
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1964-07-14· cited 40×
• Ramsey v. Hand
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1959-08-03· cited 38×
• Johnson v. Crouse
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1963-07-10· cited 31×
• State v. Messmore
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1953-12-12· cited 23×
• Woolley v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1960-05-02· cited 20×
• Uhock v. Hand
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1958-01-25· cited 10×
• State v. Chance
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1963-01-26· cited 5×