Chanay v. Chittenden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that under Arizona law there 27 could be no implied contract where there was an express contract
• permitting claim of vicarious lability of insurance company for unfair trade practices 1 of its general agent
• permitting claim of vicarious liability of insurance company for unfair trade practices [1] of its general agent
• reversing the decision to grant summary judgment on a tortious interference claim in which the plaintiff, an insurance agent, was fired after another agent caused the termination and gained all of the plaintiffs business
• “There can be no implied contract where there is an express contract between the parties on the same subject matter.”
• “Summary judgment is not designed to resolve factual issues, but to ascertain whether such issues exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).