Champion v. Secretary of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court 17 abused its discretion in applying “market rates in effect more than two years before the 18 work was performed”
• holding that “dismissal without prejudice to a future action on exhausted claims both makes practical sense and comports with the remedial purposes of Title VII”
• holding district court abused its discretion in applying market 15 rates in effect more than two years before work performed
• reasoning that “the ALJ is not required to discuss evidence that is 12 neither significant nor probative”
• applying outcome to plaintiffs who still had an opportunity to timely file administrative charges
• Rooker- 17 Feldman bar applies only when the “federal plaintiff [is] complaining of legal injury caused by a 18 state court judgment because of a legal error committed by the state court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).