Champagne v. Commissioner of Correction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting judicial deference appropriate where policy’s infringement on First Amendment rights is insignificant
• vagueness challenge to prison regulation that allowed superintendent or designee to disapprove of prisoner’s receipt of correspondence
• appellate court may affirm summary judgment for any reason supported by record
• appellate court not bound by ground relied on by Superior Court
• invalidating prison regulation which gave prison authorities too much discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).