Skip to main content
· 3/13/1917

Chambersburg Woolen Co. v. Hager

Citations

  • 66 Pa. Super. 63
  • 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 193

Syllabus

<p>Equity — Easement—Waters—Findings of fact — Review.</p> <p>The grant of a fee subject to an easement carries with it the right to make any use of the servient soil that does not interfere with the easement.</p> <p>A decree dismissing a bill in equity for an injunction to restrain interference with an easement in a stream, will be affirmed, where the court below has found as a fact based on sufficient evidence that there was no substantial interference with the plaintiff’s easement.</p>

Judges: Auy, Béfore, Head, Henderson, Kephart, Porter, Trexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.