Chambers v. United States Department of the Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the Privacy Act, like FOIA, requires” that a search “be reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that “the Privacy Act, like FOIA, requires” that a search be “reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that “the Privacy Act, like FOIA, requires” that a search “be reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that “the Privacy Act, like FOIA, requires” that a search be “reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that “the court may rely on a reasonably detailed affidavit” at summary-judgment stage
• recognizing substantial weight traditionally accorded agency affidavits in FOIA “adequacy of search” cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).