Skip to main content
· 7/9/2019

CHAMBERS v. the STATE.

Citations

  • 831 S.E.2d 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the Board lacked jurisdiction over an appeal of adverse employment action, it lacked jurisdiction to hear a related due process claim
  • “[T]he CSRA channels judicial review of an adverse action exclusively through the Federal Circuit only if it first channels review through the Board.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.