Chambers v. Sims

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an RFC limited to “simple, routine, or repetitive 16 tasks” is incompatible with level three reasoning but consistent with level two reasoning
• saying that \'plus' factor[s] include 'excessive pressure'\ (quoting United States v. Guevara, 706 F.3d 38, 46 (1st Cir. 2013))
• where we found that no entrapment defense was required
• where we found that no entrapment defense was required
• “[W]e ordinarily presume that juries follow instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).