Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/19/1991

Chambers v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 571 N.E.2d 1001
  • 213 Ill. App. 3d 1
  • 156 Ill. Dec. 1021
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • request for summons failed to designate a return date and did not include the name of the attorney of record or the addresses of the parties in interest
  • request for summons failed to designate a return date and did not include the name of the attorney of record or the addresses of the parties in interest
  • the claimant’s “written request for summons substantially complied with the requirements of section 19(f)(1)”
  • the claimant's \written request for summons substantially complied with the requirements of section 19(f)(1)\
  • under section 19(f)(1), claimant’s request for summons and for review of Commission’s decision was in substantial compliance with requirements even though it did not name employer’s attorney of record, absent showing of prejudice
  • failure to designate return date did not defeat circuit court’s jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.