Chambers, Brandon Michael

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “we will not question the reasoning of a district court unless an appellant ‘actually argue[s]’ against it”
• “[W]e will not question the reasoning of a district court unless an appellant actually argues against it.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[W]e have never squarely held the ADA applies to arrests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).