Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 12/12/2001
Chamberlin v. Chamberlin
Citations
- 2001 ME 167
- 785 A.2d 1247
- 2001 Me. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[a] divorce court is required to consider the ‘economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of property is to become effective’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Calkins, Dana, Rudman, Saufley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Spooner v. SpoonerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-05-28· cited 23×
- Lewin v. SkehanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-03-13· cited 21×
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-02-14· cited 20×
- Williams v. St. PierreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-02-07· cited 11×
- Heather J. Thumith v. Kenneth D. ThumithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-07-16· cited 7×
- Kruy v. KruySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-01-29· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Doucette v. WashburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-02-22· cited 29×
- Long v. LongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-07-24· cited 28×
- Sewall v. SaritvanichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-03-12· cited 22×
- Clum v. GravesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-05-19· cited 18×
- Tibbetts v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-12-06· cited 9×
- Libby v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-08-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.