Chamberlain v. Lishansky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• police investigators who tampered with evidence at plaintiff’s criminal trial did not abuse process because “the objective of their tampering was firmly within the scope of the legitimate, intended use of the process — to convict a hit-and-run drunk driver”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).