Skip to main content
· 4/25/2011

Chamberlain v. Director of Revenue

Citations

  • 342 S.W.3d 334
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 541
  • 2011 WL 1551043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to preserve a challenge to the exclusion of evidence, a definite and specific offer of proof showing the admissibility of the evidence must be made at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis, Scott, Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.