Skip to main content
· 3/23/2010

Chaluisan v. Simsmetal East LLC

Citations

  • 698 F. Supp. 2d 397
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27157
  • 2010 WL 1050977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that supplemental jurisdiction existed when the state and federal claims were “likely to require testimony from the same witnesses” and involved “much of the same evidence”
  • finding “a strong rationale for exercising supplemental jurisdiction” where federal and state claims “will involve similar witnesses and evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul G. Gardephe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.