Chalmers v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the notion that an individual’s right to a resource pursuant to the regulation is dependent upon the difficulty, legal expense, or convenience of exercising his or her legal right to it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-11-08· cited 3×
• Hunt v. Astrue
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-10-08· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.
  Supreme Court· 1945-06-04· cited 1,565×
• De Sylva v. Ballentine
  Supreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 393×
• Ms. Antonina Cannuni on Behalf of Joseph M. Cannuni v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services. Appeal of Antonina Cannuni
  Third Circuit· 1984-08-01· cited 34×
• Herron v. Heckler
  N.D. California· 1983-10-31· cited 18×
• Hattie Beatty O/b/o Dorease M. Beatty v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Third Circuit· 1982-05-21· cited 12×
• Chalmers v. Shalala
  Third Circuit· 1994-01-24· cited 7×
• Chalmers v. Sullivan
  D. New Jersey· 1993-04-13· cited 3×