Skip to main content
· 4/21/2011

Chalifoux v. RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES

Citations

  • 708 S.E.2d 834
  • 281 Va. 690
  • 2011 Va. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus, the dispositive issue is whether ‘a continuous and substantially uninterrupted course of examination and treatment’ existed between Chalifoux and Radiology Associates[.]”
  • “continuous treatment” rule applied to extend statute of limitations in medical malpractice case
  • noting Virginia has not adopted the “discovery rule”
  • noting Virginia has not adopted the “discovery rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.