Chalifoux Ex Rel. Chalifoux v. New Caney Independent School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that school policy that prohibited the wearing of “gang-related apparel” was unconstitutionally vague because it lacked a sufficient definition of such apparel
• holding that school policy that prohibited the wearing of \gang-related apparel\ was unconstitutionally vague because it lacked a sufficient definition of such apparel
• holding that it would not “be overly burdensome for the District to provide a definite list of prohibited items and to update that list as needed”
• holding that it would not \be overly burdensome for the District to provide a definite list of prohibited items and to update that list as needed\
• finding in the First Amendment context that, although wearing a “rosary as a necklace is neither a requirement of orthodox Catholicism nor a common Catholic practice,” this “form of religious practice is entitled to . . . protection”
• “The fact that wearing a rosary as a necklace is not mandated by orthodox Catholicism does not defeat their First Amendment rights to free exercise of their personal beliefs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).