Chaitman v. Paisano Automotive Liquids, Inc. (In Re Almarc Manufacturing, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a number of courts have applied the date of hon- or rule to Section 547(b), but applied the date of receipt rule to Section 547(c)(4)
• check not necessarily transferred at same time under subsections (b) and (c)(1
• section 547(c)(4) requires preference, that new value be unsecured and unpaid
• check not necessarily transferred at same time under subsections (b) and (c)(1
• section 547(c)(4) requires preference, that new value be unsecured and unpaid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).