Skip to main content
· 3/15/2000

Chaiken v. Lewis

Citations

  • 754 So. 2d 118
  • 2000 WL 276381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party that acquiesced to a trial court determination did not preserve the issue for appellate review
  • holding that a party that acquiesced to a trial court determination did not preserve the issue for appellate review
  • holding “that counsel for a partnership represents the partnership entity, but does not thereby become counsel for each partner individually” was a correct jury instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Gersten and Sorondo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.