Skip to main content
· 12/5/2006

Chaganti & Associates, P.C. v. Thomas Nowotny Roger v. Vardeleon, in Re Chaganti & Associates, P.C.

Citations

  • 470 F.3d 1215
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the Court’s authority to hold a party in civil contempt for failing “to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order”
  • finding order to execute certain documents was clear and specific despite failing to identify the specific documents because the pleadings and discussions at a hearing made it clear which documents the order referenced
  • vacating sanction order in analogous circumstances and remanding for further proceedings
  • “A contempt order must be based on a party’s failure to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order.”
  • “A contempt order must be based on a party's failure to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order.”
  • “A contempt order must be based on a party's failure to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Colloton, Kyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.