· 12/5/2006
Chaganti & Associates, P.C. v. Thomas Nowotny Roger v. Vardeleon, in Re Chaganti & Associates, P.C.
Citations
- 470 F.3d 1215
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the Court’s authority to hold a party in civil contempt for failing “to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order”
- finding order to execute certain documents was clear and specific despite failing to identify the specific documents because the pleadings and discussions at a hearing made it clear which documents the order referenced
- vacating sanction order in analogous circumstances and remanding for further proceedings
- “A contempt order must be based on a party’s failure to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order.”
- “A contempt order must be based on a party's failure to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order.”
- “A contempt order must be based on a party's failure to comply with a ‘clear and specific’ underlying order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Colloton, Kyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.