Skip to main content
· 7/1/1874

Chadwick v. Meredith

Citations

  • 40 Tex. 380

Syllabus

<p>1. In an injunction suit to restrain the sale of lots levied on, but claimed to be exempt as homestead, but which was not the residence of plaintiff, . but detached, and which plaintiff did not claim as homestead when adjudged a bankrupt a year or two before the levy, and which had not been set aside as such, a verdict of two hundred and fifty dollars damages held to be excessive.</p> <p>Oír Reheaking.</p> <p>2. A remittitur of damages held to be excessive after the reversal by Supreme Court does not authorize the appellee to claim an affirmance of the judgment.</p>

Judges: McAdoo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.