Chadwell v. Knox County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the involuntary discontinuance of business due to a cease and desist order cannot be deemed to be abandonment under the zoning ordinance
• referring to the “collateral” protection of section 13-7-208(b) and the local ordinance guarantying the continuance of “any lawful use of . . . land existing at the time of the passage of this resolution”
• “[W]e do not find any authority which authorizes a motion to alter or amend in order to allow a party to present her case under a new theory when the facts and law were available to be argued at the trial prior to the court’s original decree.”
• “[W]e do not find any authority which authorizes a motion to alter or amend in order to allow a party to present her case under a new theory when the facts and law were available to be argued at the trial prior to the court’s original decree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).