Skip to main content
· 5/11/2023

Chad E. Hammann v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating an EPA rule that conflicted with circuit precedent and explaining that the EPA “must obey the Clean Air Act as written by Congress and interpreted by this court”
  • “We agree with the Sierra Club that EPA’s use of work practice standards instead of emission floors violates section 7412(h

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.