Chaban v. Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the reasoning in Armstrong applies equally to proceedings” seeking to enforce provisions of the federal Act “in state as well as federal courts”
• \All of the reasoning in Armstrong applies equally to proceedings in state as well as federal courts\
• Medicaid Act's requirement that State agency publish proposed rates of payment and allow for public comment was \sufficiently specific to create a ministerial duty enforceable in [State] writ proceedings by health care providers\
• rejecting 21 equitable affirmative defense against a statutory violation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).