Skip to main content
· 7/15/1960

Chaapel v. State

Citations

  • 122 So. 2d 80
  • 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 3070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Anders procedure set forth in Rule 1925(c)(4) is proper in a termination of parental rights case
  • holding that decision of counsel to follow Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c)(4) procedure in a termination of parental rights case was proper
  • holding that decision of counsel to follow Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c)(4) procedure in a termination of parental rights case was proper
  • holding that decision of counsel to follow Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c)(4) procedure in a termination of parental rights case was proper
  • holding that the Anders procedure set forth in Rule 1925(c)(4) is proper in a termination of parental rights case
  • holding that decision of counsel to follow Rule 1925(c)(4) procedure in a termination of parental rights case was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.