Skip to main content
· 6/30/1988

Chaabi v. United States

Citations

  • 544 A.2d 1247
  • 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 115
  • 1988 WL 74367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that basis of admissibility is that a party has ample opportunity to deny or explain admissions used against her
  • noting that basis of admissibility is that a party has ample opportunity to deny or explain admissions used against her
  • stating that, when the government introduces a new matter on rebuttal, surrebuttal is “mandatory”
  • stating that, when the government introduces a new matter on rebuttal, surrebuttal is “mandatory”
  • explaining that the party-opponent is entitled to “ample opportunity” at trial to deny or explain the admission (quoting MCCORMICK ON EVIDENCE § 37, at 81 (3d ed. 1984)). 43 Smith v. Swick & Shapiro, P.C., 75 A.3d 898, 902 (D.C. 2013
  • “the party will have ample opportunity for denial or explanation after the inconsistent statement is proved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacK, Belson, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.