C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government was not automatically entitled to supersedeas without bond because the judgment had not been stayed under any other provisions of FRCP 62, as FRCP 62(e) requires
• holding that the government was not automatically entitled to supersedeas without bond because the judgment had not been stayed under any other provisions of FRCP 62, as FRCP 62(e) requires
• holding that the government was not automatically entitled to supersedeas without bond because the judgment had not been stayed under any other provisions of FRCP 62, as FRCP 62(e) requires
• noting that the government was not entitled to supersedeas as a matter of right because the judgment was not stayed under any other subdivisions of FRCP 62, which is required under FRCP 62(e)
• noting that the government was not entitled to supersedeas as a matter of right because the judgment was not stayed under any other subdivisions of FRCP 62, which is required under FRCP 62(e)
• noting that the government was not entitled to supersedeas as a matter of right because the judgment was not stayed under any other subdivisions of FRCP 62, which is required under FRCP 62(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).