C.G. Ex Rel. A.S. v. Five Town Community School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court \supportably concluded\ that public school day placement rather than residential placement requested by parents was least restrictive environment appropriate
• noting that \[i]t is common ground that the IDEA manifests a preference for mainstreaming\ students with special needs
• acknowledging \the truism that courts should recognize the expertise of educators with respect to the efficacy of educational programs\
• finding unreasonableness where “the parents’ actions disrupted the IEP process, stalling its consummation and preventing the development of a final IEP”
• emphasizing the underlying goal of identifying and utilizing \the least restrictive educational environment\ that will simultaneously \accommodate the child's legitimate needs\
• outlining the procedural requirements for a parent to request and challenge an IEP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).