Cfmt, Inc. And Cfm Technologies, Inc. v. Yieldup International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for determination whether genuine issue of material fact required parties to proceed to trial on enablement issue
• remanding for determination whether genuine issue of material fact required parties to proceed to trial on enablement issue
• finding no material misrepresentation in part because a PTO examiner’s reasons for allowance did not reflect that the PTO relied on the allegedly false applicant statements
• \Improvement and selection inventions are ubiquitous in patent law; such developments do not cast doubt on enablement of the original invention.\
• lengthy experiments do not show nonenablement because the “inventors undertook that work to satisfy ... particular commercial requirements, not to show enablement of the scope of the claimed inventions”
• Enablement is gauged “at the date of filing, not in light of later developments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).