Skip to main content
· 10/11/2005

CFM COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. Mitts Telecasting Company

Citations

  • 424 F. Supp. 2d 1229
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42409
  • 2005 WL 2562651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an expert may describe a complicated agency process, but the testimony may not prescribe legal standards for the jury to apply to the facts of the case or to interpret the legal effect of the terms
  • excluding expert testimony on (1) what factors the FCC considers in deciding control of a broadcast station and how such factors apply to the case; (2) whether and how any FCC action indicates its likely decision on any legal issue; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.