Skip to main content
· 5/2/1900

Cevada v. Miera

Citations

  • 10 N.M. 62
  • 10 Gild. 62

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Appellate Practice — Assignments of Error. — An assignment of error, such as, “The judgment of the court is contrary to the law,” is too general, and will not be considered by this court.</p> <p>2. Attachment — Action on Bond by Claimant of Property — Issue in. — In a suit for damages by one claiming to be the real owner, for the selling of wool taken on attachment from another person, on a writ issued by a justice of the peace,'the trial court properly excluded the question, “Was the sale of the wool published in a newspaper for a period of three-four weeks prior to the date of the sale?” as our statutes do not require such publication, nor is it material, as the real question at issue is, did the wool belong to the plaintiff or to some other person? It is not material to the recovery of damages, whether or not the forms of law were complied with, as to the sale of the wool attached.</p>

Judges: Below, Crumpacker, Having, Leland, McFie, Mills, Nor, Parker, Who

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.