Cetina v. Longworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here the defendant’s activities do not specifically target Connecticut consumers, ‘there can be no purposeful availment of the laws of the State of Connecticut, and therefore long-arm jurisdiction cannot be proper’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).