· 1/18/1982
Cetenko v. United California Bank
Citations
- 638 P.2d 1299
- 30 Cal. 3d 528
- 179 Cal. Rptr. 902
- 1982 Cal. LEXIS 138
- 34 A.L.R. 4th 657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the attorney’s lien had priority because it was created several years before a third party was granted a lien
- noting that discouraging attorneys from initiating suits on behalf of clients who owe debts “would be detrimental not only to prospective litigants, but to their creditors as well
- under California law, a lien for attorney's fees depends upon the intention of the attorney and client in entering their fee agreement
- under California law, a lien for attorney’s fees depends upon the intention of the attorney and client in entering their fee agreement
- attorney’s lien is superior to that of another creditor who obtained a lien on the same judgment
- “A lien in favor of an attorney upon the proceeds of a prospective judgment in favor of his client for legal services rendered has been recognized in numerous cases.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.