Skip to main content
· 1/18/1982

Cetenko v. United California Bank

Citations

  • 638 P.2d 1299
  • 30 Cal. 3d 528
  • 179 Cal. Rptr. 902
  • 1982 Cal. LEXIS 138
  • 34 A.L.R. 4th 657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the attorney’s lien had priority because it was created several years before a third party was granted a lien
  • noting that discouraging attorneys from initiating suits on behalf of clients who owe debts “would be detrimental not only to prospective litigants, but to their creditors as well
  • under California law, a lien for attorney's fees depends upon the intention of the attorney and client in entering their fee agreement
  • under California law, a lien for attorney’s fees depends upon the intention of the attorney and client in entering their fee agreement
  • attorney’s lien is superior to that of another creditor who obtained a lien on the same judgment
  • “A lien in favor of an attorney upon the proceeds of a prospective judgment in favor of his client for legal services rendered has been recognized in numerous cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.