Cesar v. Achim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is not an unconstitutional condition on [detainee’s] right to appeal” if government prolongs detention when detainee appeals removal proceeding “because detention during removal proceedings and the removal period is constitutionally permissible”
• noting that within the six-month period, the detainee must prove the unreasonableness of detention, which is a “heavier” burden than applies “after six months [have] elapsed”
• “[T]he presumption scheme merely 20 suggests that the burden the detainee must carry within the first six months . . . is a heavier 21 one than after six months has elapsed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).